Re: Schedule job entry verses sbmjob verses interactive job

At 02:10 27/09/98 -0700, you wrote:
>I have a utility that can seems to behave in two different ways when
>submitted using sbmjob and submitted using a scheduled job entry.
>Moreover, in some instances the sbmjob does not generate the same
>results as an interactive job.
>
>  1) When a submitted from an interactive job using submit job it
>appears to work correctly accessing          files in the correct manner
>and producing the correct output.
>
>  2) When submitted from a scheduled job entry no output is produced.
>
>I know that when a sbmjob entry is evoked it copies the user environment
>and authority well enough.
>
>The schedule job entry has QSECOFR as the user and contains a job
>description that would mirror the environment of the interactive job (I
>belive with the same library list). Is there a system value that would
>be involved here or something else that may cause the schedule job entry
>not the correct results. The program also uses QTEMP and shared folders.
>What am I missing?
>
>Thanks in advance for any insight on this matter.
>

One suggestion - do the different user profiles have different default
libraries ?

I suggest you check out the user profiles and the job descriptions, and
also the current library. The, using the paramters of the SBMJOB command as
a guide, try and work out whetehr it would be getting submitted differently
under each of the environments. 

Logging the job and checking the JOBLOG would also be a good move.

Hope this helps

Cheers
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---