RE: CA for Win95 (on IE4.01)

[Vernon Hamberg <hambergv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Eric

At 09:24 AM 6/1/1998 -0700, you wrote:
>So instead of re-booting Windows 95, he can re-boot Windows NT?
>
>snip
>
>>be shipping with our new PCs the new fiscal year.  Looks like we need to
>>downgrade to Win95 (OSR1 or OSR2.)  Heavy sigh.  For the PCs, how I wish for
>>the DOS and terminal days again......heavy sigh.  (I'm probably showing my
>>youth here compared to some of the *old*, real old timers.) <BG>
>
>Have you considered NT? It costs a little more, but what is the cost of
>multiple reboots every day? We're trying to standardize on NT here, for
>reasons of security (95 has absolutely no true security, as you probably
>know) and stability.
>
>Although I have 95 at home, I don't have much time for it on a business
>sytem. I can't believe 98 will be good for anything othere than a home
>system, either.  JMHO

Actually I've had nowhere near the number of problems with NT that I had
with 95. I think it's actually better. I'm no great fan of M$, but it's
everywhere, and I guess we just have to deal with it.

Heh

Vernon Hamberg
Systems Software Programmer
Old Republic National Title Insurance Company
400 Second Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN  55401-2499
(612) 371-1111 x480


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---