× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Structured RPG ? - Was ITER/LEAVE
  • From: John Carr <74711.77@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 00:00:39 -0400


   Was - ILE RPG:Is the use of ITER & LEAVE Structured Programming?


>Booth said
>or, 
>      C   01 02 03                EXSR SR001
>
>Can left side indicators be all wrong?  I know, I know.  I won't use them,
>but really, what is unclear about that line of code?
>
 
>>   at 10:45 PM, Neil Palmer <npalmer@NxTrend.com> said:
>>
>>Or:
>>                              *IN01  IFEQ   '0'
>>                              *IN02  ANDEQ  '1'
>>                              *IN03  ANDEQ  '0'
>>                                      ....
>>                                      code
>>                                      ....
>>                                     ENDIF
>>                            

Hi all
I think these are both examples of "What would you do if you  were in
 a dark alley, in a bad section of town, and ....."

There is no good answer.   You have to look back upstream for the answer.
Why do you have three Indicators defining some condition as variable 
flags.   The structure and read-ability has already been compromised. 

Can either one of the above provide lucidity on whats going on there??
Is there more information about the decision being made than is being
shown?

Curious, Which one of these is more readable?? Whats everyones opinion? 

-----------------------------------------
        Amt_Due         IFGT    0       
        Payment         ANDGT   0
        Chk_Amt         ANDGT   0
                        EXSR    Do_Payment

                        Endif
                        Endif   
                        Endif

or this --------------------------------------------------

                        IF      ((Amt_Due >0) + (Payment >0) +  
                                 (Chk_Amt >0))

                        EXSR    Do_Payment
                        Endif

With writing it one of these ways,  Not only do you know that something
will be done if these three conditions are true,  BUT you also know this
is most likely dealing with money and something to do with payments.  

These add tremendous leveraging power to the Maintenance/Enhancement 
capability of your staff as well as the application base.

Things won't break as often from a mis-diagnosis of the problem and have
the fix break more than the fix.

Just Curious.  Which of the 4,  people like better?

John Carr

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.