|
That could affect the pricing, as you can "upgrade" from a 200 to a 600, but not to a 170. Neil Palmer AS/400~~~~~ NxTrend Technology - Canada ____________ ___ ~ Thornhill, Ontario, Canada |OOOOOOOOOO| ________ o|__||= Phone: (905) 731-9000 x238 |__________|_|______|_|______) Cell.: (416) 565-1682 x238 oo oo oo oo OOOo=o\ Fax: (905) 731-9202 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mailto:NPalmer@NxTrend.com AS/400 The Ultimate Business Server http://www.NxTrend.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Leo Lefebvre [SMTP:leo@tug.on.ca] > Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 1998 12:31 AM > To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com > Subject: Re: Model 600, part of history? > > Thanks Neil for your FAST and complete answer. > > I forgot to mention, though, today my client is running a 200-2031. > > > Neil Palmer wrote: > > > Leo, > > > > With the 170's there are few reasons these days to consider a 600 or > > S10. > > A few differences between a 600 or S10 and a 170: > > > > MAIN STORAGE > > 512MB max on the 600/S10. 1024MB on the 170. > > > > DISK CAPACITY > > With V4R2 600/S10 can take the 17.54GB disks, for total of 175.4GB > (vs. > > 85.8 on 170 which can't use 17.54GB units). > > > > TAPE > > Only reason here would be if you wanted an internal 8mm tape. > 600/S10 > > can, 170 can't > > On the other side of the argument, the 170 (expansion unit/sidecar > > required) can attach 2 external tapes (1/2" Reel or Cart, 8mm), > 600/S10 > > only 1. > > > > TWINAX ADDRESSES > > 600 unit can have 188 vs. 68 on base 170 (BUT the 170 "sidecar" can > add > > another 160 for 228 address total). > > Only 28 twinax addresses on the S10 server. > > > > COMMUNICATION / LANS > > 9 comm lines on a 600/S10, 12 on a 170. > > 3 LAN ports on a 600/S10, 6 on a 170. > > 1 ATM adapter on a 600/S10, 3 on a 170. > > 1 IPCS on a 600/S10, 2 on a 170. > > > > As for going to a 2159 today and upgrading to a 2164 next year. > > Advantages are: > > 2159 is in IBM's P05 Software Group, vs. P10 for a 2164, so you > wouldn't > > need to pay the extra for IBM software for a year. > > Also, you would save the cost of the extra charge for the 2164 > processor > > for a year until you needed to upgrade (and you may find the 2159 is > > giving the performance you need and could defer this upgrade a > little > > longer). > > And the higher the processor model, the higher the maintenance > charge. > > > > What model 600 are they looking at in comparison to the 2159/2164 > > scenario, a 2129 ? > > If that's the case, and they mainly need interactive performance, > the > > 600 could be a better priced solution as you could stay with the > 2129 > > which is at the P05 Software Group. If you were looking at a 2134 > or > > 2135 you would be back at the P10 group, like the 170-2164. (You > could > > step up one processor level on the 170, to the 2160, and stay at the > P05 > > group). > > However, if interactive performance wasn't quite so critical, and > you > > could take advantage of the faster batch/client server performance > in a > > 170, the 170 may be the better deal. > > > > Performance comparisons (CPW for V4, interactive/batch - followed by > IBM > > Software Group): > > > > 600-2129 22.7/x P05 > > 600-2134 32.5/x P10 > > 600-2135 45.4/x P10 > > 600-2136 73.1/x P20 > > > > 170-2159 16/73 P05 > > 170-2160 23/114 P05 > > 170-2164 29/125 * P10 > > 170-2176 40/125 * P10 > > 170-2183 67/125 * P20 > > > > * Client Server/Batch performance constrained by memory/DASD > maximums. > > If your application has heavy CPU bound tasks, you may be able to > take > > more advantage of the unconstrained ratings of the 2164/2176/2183 > which > > are 210/319/319 respectively. > > > > Neil Palmer AS/400~~~~~ > > NxTrend Technology - Canada ____________ ___ ~ > > Thornhill, Ontario, Canada |OOOOOOOOOO| ________ o|__||= > > Phone: (905) 731-9000 x238 |__________|_|______|_|______) > > Cell.: (416) 565-1682 x238 oo oo oo oo OOOo=o\ > > Fax: (905) 731-9202 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > mailto:NPalmer@NxTrend.com AS/400 The Ultimate Business Server > > http://www.NxTrend.com > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Leo Lefebvre [SMTP:leo@tug.on.ca] > > > Sent: Monday, April 06, 1998 8:58 PM > > > To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com > > > Subject: Model 600, part of history? > > > > > > A Business Partner told my client, today, that the model 600 was > > > history > > > and he should be looking at a model 170 instead? > > > Any thruth to that statement? > > > > > > Is there any advantage to get a model 170-2159 today and move to a > > > 170-2164 next year, as opposed to getting the 2164 today? > > > > > > TIA > > > -- > > > > > > Leo Lefebvre > > > leo@tug.on.ca > > > Toronto Users Group for Midrange Systems > > > Visit our home page at <http://www.tug.on.ca> > > > Ph: (416) 606-5960 --- Fx: (416) 495-0100 > > > > > > > > > > > +--- > > | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! > > | To submit a new message, send your mail to > MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. > > | To unsubscribe from this list send email to > MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. > > | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: > david@midrange.com > > +--- > > > > -- > > Leo Lefebvre > leo@tug.on.ca > Toronto Users Group for Midrange Systems > Visit our home page at <http://www.tug.on.ca> > Ph: (416) 606-5960 --- Fx: (416) 495-0100 > > > +--- > | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! > | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. > | To unsubscribe from this list send email to > MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. > | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: > david@midrange.com > +--- +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.