RE: WRKACTJOB

I would say yes.  Sounds like the users are using it as a storage area
for old reports.  You should look at some of the Report Archive tools
available.  There is code available in QUSRTOOL that could help.  IBM
has the RDARS product, and there are many vendor products available
also.


... Neil Palmer                                     AS/400~~~~~      
... NxTrend Technology - Canada     ____________          ___  ~     
... Thornhill, Ontario,  Canada     |OOOOOOOOOO| ________  o|__||=   
... Phone: (905) 731-9000  x238     |__________|_|______|_|______)   
... Cell.: (416) 565-1682  x238      oo      oo   oo  oo   OOOo=o\   
... Fax:   (905) 731-9202         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 
... mailto:NPalmer@NxTrend.com          http://www.NxTrend.com


        -----Original Message-----
        From:   Doug Barnes [SMTP:Doug.Barnes@RHTelCo.Com]
        Sent:   Tuesday, February 03, 1998 10:31 AM
        To:     MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
        Subject:        WRKACTJOB

        We have a 510 that takes 10-15 seconds to respond after a
        WRKACTJOB command.
        We also have another 510 (same processor) that only takes 2 or
less.
        The one that takes a long time shows 27000+ jobs when a
WRKSYSSTS
        is run. The other on only has 2700 jobs. Is that the main
difference?

        Doug Barnes                     mailto://doug.barnes@rhtelco.com
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---