|
Hi, Doug: Well, that *has* to have something to do with it... but you tell us: is that the main difference? Are CPU loads, number of attached users, number of batch jobs, number of active writers, ... are all these things equal on the two systems? Food for thought Dennis Lovelady Simpsonville, SC life: dennis@lovelady.com work: dennis.lovelady@kemet.com www: http://cybercity.piedmont.net/~dennis ICQ UIN: 5734860 Doug Barnes <Doug.Barnes@RHTelCo.Com> on 02/03/98 11:13:58 AM To: MIDRANGE-L <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com> @ INTERNET cc: Subject: WRKACTJOB We have a 510 that takes 10-15 seconds to respond after a WRKACTJOB command. We also have another 510 (same processor) that only takes 2 or less. The one that takes a long time shows 27000+ jobs when a WRKSYSSTS is run. The other on only has 2700 jobs. Is that the main difference? +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com". | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
