Re: Mapped LDA - ILE common variables

John Carr wrote:

> Date:   1/8/98  3:03 AM
>
> RE:     Re: Mapped LDA - ILE common variables
> <Ok Jon,  I'll bite.
> I'd be the first one to use a Userspace(use them already in some cases)
> instead of the LDA as soon as you/IBM give us one that is ;
>
> A) Automatically created by the OS for each unique job on the machine.
> B) Can't be accessed by some other process/job (private)
> C) Trancends the SBMJOB boundary by the OS
> D) Gets destroyed by the OS as soon as job is destroyed(garbage collection)
>
> (and we don't want persistence for this function jon)
>
> The operative words here Jon are "by the OS'.
>
> Hmm,  It almost looks like I defined the LDA.  Those early did have some
> great vision, Imagine a Global variable that has all 4 qualities.
> All 4 are a HARD requirement for a replacement for the LDA.
>

Please remove the restriction on *LDA being only 1024 bytes.  Please make it 
1MB.
1024 is too little....:-(
--
Thank You.

Regards

Dave Mahadevan.. mailto:mahadevan@fuse.net


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---