|
At 03:24 PM 12/23/97 -0600, you wrote: >Folks: > >Someone at my office heard a rumor that PL/I is being withdrawn as an >available language starting with V4R2. > When we went from CISC to RISC (from V3R1 [CISC] to V3R6 [RISC] - notwithstanding V3R2 [CISC] which came after V3R7 [RISC] [I think]), PL/1, BASIC and Pascal were changed from LPPs to RPQs. Ultimately, PASCAL was withdrawn! What's the diff? A few things: IBM basically provides less support for RPQs than to LPPs or LPOs. When an LPP or LPO is degraded to an RPQ, there is significantly less of a chance of an upgrade path. It's even possible that it could be withdrawn! (see Pascal above). Although I don't expect to see PL/1 dropped, but I don't expect to see an ILE implementation. Also, there is a significantly lower chance that the product/documentation/manuals (remember those) will be translated into foreign languages. Translation is not a big issue. Most AS/400 programmers (but not necessarily C programmers) speak English to some extent. The quality of AS/400 translation is less than stellar. (The Spanish [from Spain} complain that translation is done in South America, where Spanish apparently is very different. At least in one prior release, in German, 'data base faults' translated as 'data base mistakes'!) Remember, no matter what language you speak, when you write a record in RPG, it's a WRITE statement. Although CL was designed with the ability to translate command and parameter names, this was never enabled. Enablement is not a significant technical issue, the enablement is basically there now. The cost of ongoing abbreviation/reabbevation (and subsequent testing) is the bigger issue. Text for command parameters is transilated. I run French as a secondary language on one of my systems, although I don't speak it, I have a client with a French requirement. (Dave M., please don't flame me, but the Display Monitorable Messages (DSPMONMSG) command in TAA Tools was written to display the monitorable messages - on the fly - in any language that the customer is using [assuming that the workstation is properly configured - CCSID issues, etc.].) Lastly, IBM has a financial interest in Synon. I understand that Synon is written in PL/1. Merry Christmas to all, and to all a good byte. Al Al Barsa, Jr. - Account for Midrange-L Barsa Consulting, LLC. 400 > 390 Phone: 914-251-9400 Fax: 914-251-9406 Private mail should be sent to barsa@ibm.net +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com". | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.