• Subject: RE: RISC *PGMs?
  • From: Walden Leverich <walden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 7 Oct 1997 19:06:22 -0400
  • Organization: Tech Software

Ah yes, the good 'ol non-observable program problem. How much would we all 
pay for a CISC execution environment on RISC models. IBM should be able to 
emulate a CISC processor on a RISC box. It would be slow, but at least te 
programs would run.


Walden Leverich
Tech Software

-----Original Message-----
From:   Jromeh@aol.com [SMTP:Jromeh@aol.com]
Sent:   Saturday, October 04, 1997 4:35 AM
To:     midrange-l@midrange.com
Subject:        Re: RISC *PGMs?


Thanks to Peter, Al, and Phil. Heard of this command once before, but
hadn't thought of it.

>You can do a 'mass' convert on CISC objecst to RISC using the STROBJCVN

Were that only the case. Believe some may be vendor non-observables,
possibly w/o source. Will probably need to research the needles once
CHKOBJITG churns the haystack. Haven't been causing problems, but not
using all function yet. Easier to fix now than while implementing new

Not at system, hoping CHKOBJITG allows &LIB/*ALL, or perhaps WHERE pgmnam
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com
|    and specify 'unsubscribe MIDRANGE-L' in the body of your message.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2020 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].