Re: V3R1M0 and CA95

["Al Barsa, Jr." <barsa2@xxxxxxx>]

At 12:11 AM 9/17/97 -0500, you wrote:
>In message <341F1170.2FAE@usaor.net>, From Tim Truax <truax@usaor.net>, 
>the following was written:
>> is at V3/R1/M0.  Would we be wise to upgrade to V3R2 before we 
>> implement CA95?
>
>If you can afford the time, it would be a wise thing to go to V3R2
>anyway, if only for the neat stuff in RPG. CA95 is the same in either
>case (V3R1M2). I'm running it on V3R1 and it works ok.
>
In general, if you are going to remain on CISC for any period of time, I
would go to V3R2.  A few reasons:

1.      The V3R1 PTF process is E X T R E M E L Y long and complex.

2.      V3R1 will become unsupported in 9 months.

3.      V3R2 will be supported into the next century.

V3R1M2 of CA will give you Unity (Operations Navigator), but the major
Unity functions are not enabled until V3R7 of OS/400.

Al



Al Barsa, Jr. - Account for Midrange-L
Barsa Consulting, LLC.  
400 > 390

Phone:  914-251-9400
Fax:    914-251-9406





Private mail should be sent to barsa@ibm.net
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com
|    and specify 'unsubscribe MIDRANGE-L' in the body of your message.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---