|
Tim Truax wrote: > > Hello all, > We are going to be implementing Client Access 95 on our AS400 F50 that > is at V3/R1/M0. Would we be wise to upgrade to V3R2 before we implement > CA95? > Advice appreciated! Thanks in advance. I found CA95 really "flakey" (technical talk) on V3R1M0....runs like a charm on V3R2....token ring NICs & CA95 seem to hate Ensoniq sound cards as well -- it was easier to take them out than to spend days trying to get them to co-exist. +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com". | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com | and specify 'unsubscribe MIDRANGE-L' in the body of your message. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.