Re: V3R2 life cycle

In a message dated 97-07-31 00:49:35 EDT, you write:

<< Subj:        Re: Re: V3R2 life cycle
 Date:  97-07-31 00:49:35 EDT
 From:  HankHeath@aol.com
 Sender:        mcsnet!midrange.com!midrange-l-owner@Mcs.Net
 Reply-to:      MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
 To:    MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
 
 Just wanted to send a note of thanks for the response on the life cycle of
 V3R2. Sure, there were a lot of different ideas on the subject, but it is
 impressing to see the number of people concerned about the subject.
 
 Obviously, this is a critical issue for one of my clients, as they are
trying
 to determine when and where to invest in CISC versus RISC. IBM has clouded
 the issue by offering better deals on the CISC packages than the RISC
 upgrades for them. So, they are betting sizeable dollars on staying with
CISC
 for the next few years. I'm crossing my fingers that they don't get burned
by
 such a decision.
 
 Again, thanks.
 
 Hank Heath >>

Sorry  Hank looks like cISC dies at next announcement
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* This is the Midrange System Mailing List!  To submit a new message,   *
* send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".  To unsubscribe from     *
* this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com and specify            *
* 'unsubscribe MIDRANGE-L' in the body of your message.  Questions      *
* should be directed to the list owner / operator: david@midrange.com   *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *