× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: RE: Additional RPGLE Enhancement Request
  • From: Brian Johnson <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 14 Jul 97 10:49:00 -0500
  • >Received: from Connect2 Message Router by helps.helpsystems.com via Connect2-UUCP v1.10; Sun, 13 Jul 97 10:21:39 -0500
  • Organization: HELP/Systems


Amen, brother!  :-)

Put more effort into organizing the code and less into looking for   
crutches in the language.
 --
Brian Johnson
Help/Systems, Inc.
brian@helpsystems.com


 ----------
From:  'mail@uucp <DAsmussen@aol.com>'
Sent:  Sun, Jul 13, 1997 21:58 PM
Subject:  Re: Additional RPGLE Enhancement Request

Original Subject:
Re: Additional RPGLE Enhancement Requests

Paul and Mark,

In a message dated 97-07-13 19:54:59 EDT, you write:

> At 12:53 AM 7/13/97, Mark Lazarus wrote:
>  >Charlie,
>  >
>  > Good suggestion list.  I'm sure we can all come up w/ a few   
additions to
>  >make our professional lives a bit more pleasant.
>  >
>  > One major addition (mentioned several times here before) is the   
ability
to
>  >rename fields in an output only file.
>  >
>  >>13.  We have ITER and LEAVE to exit a do loop.  How do we exit a
>  >>     subroutine without doing a GOTO.  What above an operation code
>  >>     to GOTO *ENDSR just like ITER does a GOTO ENDO and LEAVE does
>  >>     a GOTO ENDO+1.  I have no idea what to call the op code.  I
>  >>     just know we desparately need it.  (This should be trivial -
>  >>     please fix it.)
>  >
>  > How about LEAVESR ?
>
>
>  Why not just put a TAG on the ENDSR and GOTO it?  Does the same thing,
and,
>  if you call it something like LEAVE/EXIT/QUIT it's fairly obvious what
it's
>  doing.
>
>  All this just to avoid the use of a GOTO....  *sigh*

RRRRRRrrrrrrrrrrr!  How about just structuring your logic so that it   
FALLS to
the ENDSR?  Why should subroutines be any different from mainline logic?   
 A
LEAVESR command would be USELESS if the code were structured properly in   
the
first place.  I've found places for using both ITER and LEAVE, especially
when converting S/36 code.  I HAVE YET to find a place in my heart for a   
GOTO
:-).

REPENT!

Dean Asmussen
Enterprise Systems Consulting, Inc.
Fuquay-Varina, NC  USA
E-Mail:  DAsmussen@AOL.COM

"The problem with life in the fast lane is that you get to the other end   
in
an awful hurry." -- John Jensen

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* This is the Midrange System Mailing List!  To submit a new message,   *
* send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".  To unsubscribe from     *
* this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com and specify            *
* 'unsubscribe MIDRANGE-L' in the body of your message.  Questions      *
* should be directed to the list owner / operator: david@midrange.com   *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.