Re: CISC to RISC save/restore

[PaulMmn <PaulMmn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 01:29 PM 4/28/97 -0400, Mark wrote:
>We have purchased an additional development machine. Our current machine
>is a 200 and the new one is a 40S. We are planning on doing a
>save/restore to move all of our test enviroments over to the 40S from
>the 200. Is it a waste of time to save the access paths when we do the
>save on the 200? Or, will help speed up the restore on the 40S? Will the
>access paths be rebuilt automatically when restored to the 40S? The 200
>is at V3R1M0 and the 40S will be at V3R7M0. Is there any other gotchas
>we should be aware of?


Depends on how big your files are.  If they are 'huge' (your definition may
vary), saving the access path eliminates the need for the receiving system
to rebuild the access path.  

For a time estimate, remember how long it took to build the last logical
file over your files.  That's about how long it'll take for the system to
rebuild your access paths if you don't save them.

If you don't save the access path, the System will re-build it when it is
restored.  

--Paul E Musselman
PaulMmn@ix.netcom.com

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* This is the Midrange System Mailing List!  To submit a new message,   *
* send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".  To unsubscribe from     *
* this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com and specify            *
* 'unsubscribe MIDRANGE-L' in the body of your message.  Questions      *
* should be directed to the list owner / operator: david@midrange.com   *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *