× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.




On 23/05/2008, at 11:07 AM, Paul Jackson wrote:

I dumped both the tables (as well as #3 and #17) and they showed the
size value at the "new" location (offset x'1014').

If this system has these values at a different location from another supposedly the same (at least as far as LIC, OS and PTF level) then there must be another field value that is the trigger for this change. I wish I had access to a system exhibiting this behaviour.


OBJ- QWCBT01 CONTEXT- QSYS
TYPE- *ALL SUBTYPE-*ALL
OBJECT TYPE- SPACE
*WCBT
NAME- QWCBT01 TYPE- 19
SUBTYPE- D0
LIBRARY- QSYS TYPE- 04
SUBTYPE- 01
CREATION- 07/13/07 09:47:50 SIZE- 0000FFA000
OWNER- QSYS TYPE- 08
SUBTYPE- 01
ATTRIBUTES- 0800 ADDRESS- 0FC5B2BAC8
000000
SPACE ATTRIBUTES-
000000 00FFF000 00000074 19D0D8E6 C3C2E3F0 F1404040 40404040
40404040 40404040
000020 40404040 40404040 E0000000 00000000 00FF9F00 00000000
00000000 00000000
000040 00000000 00000000 3B6778EE 92000400 00000000 00000000
00000000 00000000
000060 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00FFFF00
SPACE-
000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
00000000 00000000
LINES 000020 TO 000FFF SAME AS ABOVE
001000 00008000 00000000 2837CDE8 7D00193F 00FF8F00 00FF9F00
00010000 00000000 <<===the ff9f00 here

I haven't checked the other header fields as they are not referenced
in my program plus I do not know the correct offsets.

What you see here is likely:
00008000 00000000 2837CDE8 7D00193F Pointer to QWCBT00
00FF8F00 Last available entry in this table
00FF9F00 Size of this table
0001 Number of this table

All of the info in the QWCBT00 master table is fine though as far as I can tell.

I wonder if there is a 'version' flag or something in this object?

Maybe the fact that the data at x'0000' in the QWCBTnn space is all hex zeroes IS the flag that the real data is at X'1000' instead?

Regards,
Simon Coulter.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
FlyByNight Software OS/400, i5/OS Technical Specialists

http://www.flybynight.com.au/
Phone: +61 2 6657 8251 Mobile: +61 0411 091 400 /"\
Fax: +61 2 6657 8251 \ /
X
ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML E-Mail / \
--------------------------------------------------------------------




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.