|
Now of course you do not agree. You are not in the real world battling applications. Line by line would not help, because I have real world example of everything I state, but the fact is you make things hard for us attacking the real world problems. Now let's go to XML. One of the most popular business forms of communications today. What do you have that is native? Read the documentation on the XML, then translate it in English. Better yet. Lets race. I will get someone with Visual basic experience, and you get someone with RPG experience. Who will have a .net application up first. Someone with a $500. computer or someone with a 2.5 million dollar computer. So now we have to explain to management who does not know computers, why it takes 6-8 weeks to get running on the 2.5 million computer, where the high school graduate on a PC is ready in 4 hours. ? You have enough information with a schema and XMP to do an SQL. Oh yes we can do it if we go to Java. So we can do it if we uses Sun's Java program, on the i5? But where is IBM, oh they are busy securing an already secured system, and they have to use Sun's product instead of making their own. In a meeting once, I asked why IBM was building their software on another computer companies software. You know Java. It is owned by Sun. I am in the board rooms of large corporations who are trying to sound the death march for the os/400, because of the development and to the market time. You are keeping you customers because of fools like me, who know the machine inside and out. We are the data processing P.S. we can digitally sign IBM objects now, so how do you stop us from making a business solution which you cannot or refuse to do. This just give us another hurdle, and less people to make solutions. Sounds like this mail list will be your last customers. Right now, I am IBM's wife that has been abused constantly by her husband. I am screaming for you to listen. You either listen, or there will be a divorce. That is life. You will be taking the greatest operating system known to man, and killing it, just because you want it your way. Did you read about Microsoft targeting the i5, have you read IBM's answer? Get in the game. Put me coach, I am ready to play, today. Palm was one of the greatest hand helds, until they did not keep up. Weed eater was one of the greatest products, but they did not keep up. IIS was one of the "greatest" web servers 10 years ago. Oops, they got arrogant, now it is apache. Get to be the intellectuals that run by theory, and we will be the little workers on another system. Remember the golden run. He who has the gold, rules. You are trying to extract money from us, give us what we need, not another roadblock. Now, go back to the development, let the developers talk to the real world, then lock them in a room, throw some raw meat in, and you will be the leader of the industry. Keep this anal control in existence, and we will be with you at your funeral. If you want to go over specifics line, per line I am ready with real world examples. But really, just give us the tools to compete. Quite having us fighting with knives and axes, while the other side is using cruise missiles. Now you want to take our knives away? PLEEEEEEASE. Harry -----Original Message----- From: mi400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:mi400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Paul Godtland Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 11:24 AM To: MI Programming on the AS400 / iSeries Subject: RE: [MI400] Attention Users of *SYSTEM State Wow, I love your post, Harry! I don't agree with many of your assertions, but truly appreciate the loyalty evidenced by the impassioned prose. Having worked directly on this system and its predecessors for most of my career, I too understand that it's special. A line-by-line debate probably wouldn't be productive for either of us, but I'd like to make the following points so you and others better understand the reasoning behind this change. First, Bruce didn't author the post, nor did some manager decide that better integrity is the way to go. Real customer problems motivate this change. The language in the post isn't political; it's what we're actually planning to accomplish. We're also very sincere about providing an opportunity to improve the system with additional application programming interfaces. Please request interfaces with as much specificity as possible, so it's clear what the exact needs are. Please don't dismiss this request by assuming you'll work around this change. Integrity improvements are ongoing and most aren't preannounced. This change could affect applications with legitimate purposes implemented by unsafe means, and we all want useful applications to continue to be successful. That's why this notice is being put out before the change is made. A cornerstone of iSeries systems is their integrity, where integrity is defined as doing what the system is designed to do, and only those things. Is the system integrity impervious? No, there's no such computer system in existence. On the other hand, iSeries integrity and reliability are already very strong in most ways. We strive to keep that advantage, yet integrity is not static; continual improvements must be made in order to maintain or improve upon it, as the uses and users of computer systems change. You implied that resource applied to improving integrity should be used for other purposes. The particular system change noted in Bruce's post will take very little development resource. Providing new interfaces may take significant resource. So, this change isn't about doing things on the cheap; it's investment in doing things the "right" way, which benefits everyone in the long run. Creative people such as many of the readers here can be innovative without potentially compromising the design and implementation of the operating system. You issued a challenge to name specific instances of problems caused by system state use by applications. I assure you they have occurred, but of course I won't break the confidence of those customers by naming them. You also asked for new tools to be more competitive. Here's your chance to ask for specific, helpful interfaces. Please take full advantage of it, to help all of us who want this computer system to continue to succeed. Paul Godtland IBM Rochester (not IBM's official voice) _______________________________________________ This is the MI Programming on the AS400 / iSeries (MI400) mailing list To post a message email: MI400@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mi400 or email: MI400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/mi400.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.