-----Original Message-----
From: mi400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:mi400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Leif Svalgaard
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2003 9:55 AM
To: MI Programming on the AS400 / iSeries
Subject: Re: [MI400] RE: MI emulator

>...there may be other reasons for not
>opening up the system:  "security by obscurity". As I (for one) have
>demonstrated, the system is insecure because the LQ/STQ instructions are
>not privileged instructions, i.e. can be executed by anybody. This makes
>possible for anybody to manufacture a pointer to anywhere in all of the
>single-level store. Therefore, to maintain security, it must be nearly
>for others than IBM to write compilers or construct program objects, and
>therefore one needs blocked instructions, etc, etc. This deficiency then
>ripples up through the whole system, leading to system states, extra
>activation groups (so that APIs can run), etc, etc., and none of this can
>open because then the house of cards will come crashing down.

Are Windows and Linux also a security house of cards?  If so, why is it very
important that an open source os400 would be too?


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.