Re: [MI400] Read and write performance Records VS Fields

[Don <dr2@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

you may also want to experiment with varying field types and lengths....:)


Leif, I see you're doing your presentation again at COMMON...on Thursday
as I recall...and talk about a super packed day....you think they'd take a
few of those sessions and put them on Monday or Tuesday....

Heck, I remember the BS we had to go through in Balti just to have the
first one...:)  Talk about about bunch of IBM'ers with high blood pressure
that day! I think if you'd've said "BOO!" they'd've stroked out....:)

 Don in DC

--------

On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Leif Svalgaard wrote:

> try it. and tell us. it is not hard to write a little program to do that.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: sas <sas@toto.co.id>
> To: MI Programming on the AS400 / iSeries <mi400@midrange.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 2:14 PM
> Subject: [MI400] Read and write performance Records VS Fields
>
>
> > Dear All ,
> > Does anyone has any experience , which one  has the best performance  Read
> > 1(one) record with 100 fields or read 100 records with 1(one) field.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the MI Programming on the AS400 / iSeries (MI400) mailing list
> To post a message email: MI400@midrange.com
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mi400
> or email: MI400-request@midrange.com
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/mi400.
>