Read and write performance Records VS Fields -- MI400

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: [MI400] Read and write performance Records VS Fields
From: "sas" <sas@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 03:14:36 +0700
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/mi400>
List-help: <mailto:mi400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: MI Programming on the AS400 / iSeries <mi400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:mi400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mi400>,<mailto:mi400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mi400>,<mailto:mi400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Dear All ,
Does anyone has any experience , which one  has the best performance  Read
1(one) record with 100 fields or read 100 records with 1(one) field.
Thank you.
Regards,
Sas

**************************************************************
Scanned by  MailScan Content-Security and Anti-Virus Software.
Visit http://www.mwti.net for more info on eScan and MailScan.
**************************************************************

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Read and write performance Records VS Fields , Leif Svalgaard

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.