Re: OT: malware checkers

Gentlemen,

unless there's some support from the list for this continuing, I submit
that it's way off subject and should be taken to another listserver more
relevant.



On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, Leif Svalgaard wrote:

> From: jt <jt@ee.net>
>
> > As You know, marketing is a moot point without a product, and unless it can
> > be "sufficiently" supported.
>
> you are forgetting, that I *had* a product and that it could be supported.
> We had it about the perceived difficulty of marketing it. Now, if one
> (to use your term) had "higher expectations and set a high price
> e.g. $10,000 and tier based, I could see a problem, but for $39.95?
>
> >
> > I can't tell about the humor in Your last sentence.  If semi-serious:
> Would
> > IBM, perhaps, want to prevent a "malware" checker...?  Because of NIH
> > syndrome, or to "save face"...?
>
> probably the latter. Remember: "there has NEVER been a successful
> hack of th AS/400"
>
> But, we have gone on for too long. One more exchange and we stop.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the MI Programming on the AS400 / iSeries (MI400) mailing list
> To post a message email: MI400@midrange.com
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/mi400
> or email: MI400-request@midrange.com
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/mi400.
>