|
no, we are not talking about developing the bloody thing or maintaining it, but simply marketing it, assuming that all development problems were solved. The developers may need to stay ahead of IBM rather than the hackers :-) ----- Original Message ----- From: jt <jt@ee.net> To: <mi400@midrange.com> Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 11:00 PM Subject: RE: [MI400] OT: malware checkers > You understand I'm somewhat guessing. > > But I would imagine the level of expectations would be higher, in the 400 > arena... So I wouldn't favor a mass market approach, myself. > > Would also need to have a feel for support and on-going development costs. > Don't know how hard it would be, technically, to stay ahead of the hackers. > > | why is that? In what respect is it different from McAffee or Norton? > | All do the same thing. Better be safe than sorry. If you want to > | stick your head in the sand, please do, otherwise buy the $39.95 > | AS/400 malware checker. What's so special or hard or difficult > | about that? > > > _______________________________________________ > This is the MI Programming on the AS400 / iSeries (MI400) mailing list > To post a message email: MI400@midrange.com > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/mi400 > or email: MI400-request@midrange.com > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/mi400. >
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.