Re: [MI400] V5R1 ate our host application function registrations

["Simon Coulter" <shc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello Gene,

I searched the PTF database and found one hit on
QsyRetrieveFunctionInformation at VRM430 and one hit on
QsyCheckUserFunctionUsage API at 510 but that was really just an
application programming error in DCM rather than a problem in the API.

Since the User Function Registration APIs use the Registration Facility
have you resorted to the WRKREGINF functions?  Perhaps that will allow
enough of what you need.  It won't help with the QsyCheckUserFunctionUsage
API, though but it might shed some light on other problems.

The names you show listed suggest that IBM has added the ability to
restict access to OS/400 components using the user function registration
facility.  I wasn't aware of that but it makes sense.  Are you sure that
your things are really not listed?  Is the API continuation handle set
indicating that your stuff couldn't fit in the amount of space you
provided?  If IBM did add these at 510 perhaps your entries fell off the
end and you need to call the API again specifying the continuation handle.

Failing that then presuming that you have the latest Cume and Hypers
installed for 510 then I'd be opening an APAR with IBM.

Regards,
Simon Coulter.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
   FlyByNight Software         AS/400 Technical Specialists
   http://www.flybynight.com.au/

   Phone: +61 3 9419 0175   Mobile: +61 0411 091 400        /"\
   Fax:   +61 3 9419 0175   mailto: shc@flybynight.com.au   \ /
                                                             X
                 ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML E-Mail  / \
--------------------------------------------------------------------