Tegal has created a block of items for this purpose; I think we have 10
for each of the 4 main items.
NINOTAX-1 NON-INVENTORY NON-TAXABLE
NINTXNRCPT-9 NON-INVENTORY,NO TAX-NO RCPT
NITAX-1 NON-INVENTORY TAXABLE
NITAXNRCPT-1 NON/INVENTORY,TAX-NO RCPT
We use PO comments for the actual description of what is being ordered.
All items purchased by my department are processed this way including
services from consultants. Here is a partial screen shot from recent PO
for MS Project licenses.
Date 4/10/09 Purchase Order Item Detail Inquiry
AM61A2 XU
Order PN81676 Stat 99 Contr Job 8411311 Cls
Packing cd
Vnd catalog Dept Cur ID
Canceled Seq Req Line
Item NITAX-1 NON-INVENTORY TAXABLE 1 1
MICROSOFT OFFICE PROJECT STD.2007 LICENSE
Whse AG Loc Planr 25 Stk UM EA Pur UM EA UM conv
1.00000
Eng draw no G/L acct 8411311 MISCELLANEOUS
Regards,
Jon Le Roi
Director of I.T.
Tegal Corporation
-----Original Message-----
From: mapics-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:mapics-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Heavilin, Bob
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 8:47 AM
To: mapics-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [MAPICS-L] POs Without Creating Item Revision Records
Hi Everyone,
If feasible, we would like to start using MAPICS POs for non-production
purchases - supplies, tools, repair parts, etc. The obstacle to this in
the past has been the requirement to create Item Revision records for
everything that is purchased. We would have to create about a gazillion
(that's a technical term for a big number) new item revision records,
which makes this a no-go for us.
We have 2 production environments on R6 and 1 on R7. The documentation
I have found says we can create POs for non-inventory items, but that
only means that we don't need Item Balance/Warehouse records for them
because we don't want to track inventory on such things.
We're thinking we may be able to create generic item numbers, like bolt,
pencil, hammer, etc. and override the description and price in a feed to
the purchasing files. Another thought is to find a 3rd party purchasing
module that has already been interfaced to MAPICS and which overcomes
the requirement for item revision records.
Before we spend a lot of time and/or money, we thought we should check
with this group. Has anyone out there found a way around this issue?
If so, how did you do it? If not, what thoughts come to mind?
Thanks,
Bob Heavilin
IT Project Manager
Stant Corporation
bheavilin@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:bheavilin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MAPICS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l
or email: MAPICS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at
http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.
midrange.com
