× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Bob,

We created a part number "." (just a period) with the "." in the ITMRVA description also for this purpose, and manually overrode the additional purchasing description and PO price for those parts. There were no cost values loaded in UCDEF or the various ITMRVB records. Worked fine for us, from the MAPICS/DB days up through R6. I didn't test it in R7 (we never completed the migration), but I am confident it would continue to work.

The P.O.'s were easy to read, no one had an issue with it. We did programmatically suppress (or segregate) item# "." in inventory reports. It was an easy to use method of tracking and controlling.

Dale "Cork" Gindlesperger, CPIM
Senior Business Analyst


-----Original Message-----
From: mapics-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:mapics-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Heavilin, Bob
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 11:47 AM
To: mapics-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [MAPICS-L] POs Without Creating Item Revision Records

Hi Everyone,

If feasible, we would like to start using MAPICS POs for non-production purchases - supplies, tools, repair parts, etc. The obstacle to this in the past has been the requirement to create Item Revision records for everything that is purchased. We would have to create about a gazillion (that's a technical term for a big number) new item revision records, which makes this a no-go for us.

We have 2 production environments on R6 and 1 on R7. The documentation I have found says we can create POs for non-inventory items, but that only means that we don't need Item Balance/Warehouse records for them because we don't want to track inventory on such things.

We're thinking we may be able to create generic item numbers, like bolt, pencil, hammer, etc. and override the description and price in a feed to the purchasing files. Another thought is to find a 3rd party purchasing module that has already been interfaced to MAPICS and which overcomes the requirement for item revision records.

Before we spend a lot of time and/or money, we thought we should check with this group. Has anyone out there found a way around this issue? If so, how did you do it? If not, what thoughts come to mind?

Thanks,
Bob Heavilin
IT Project Manager
Stant Corporation
bheavilin@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:bheavilin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


_______________________________________________
This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MAPICS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l
or email: MAPICS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.238 / Virus Database: 270.11.51/2052 - Release Date: 04/10/09 06:39:00

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.