× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.




Hi Dee
Long time.. we have written a internal supply chain management app (more roubust than ISL/MISL) which addresses the currency issue with an environment. We store currency at the warehouse level. Prereqs are EPDM and IFM, IM and PUR and COM.Thanks Douglas M. Emerineemerinedoug@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: mapics-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> From: dee.sondergard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:24:34 -0600> Subject: Re: [MAPICS-L] new company - separate environments> > As Doug said - lots of issues. Over the years we've dealt with them in a > number of ways. > The thing you need to be concerned about is primarily the cost currency. > When you install a MAPICS environment it ask you for the primary > environment currency - read COST. No currency conversion goes on - IFM or > not - of costs. So, for example, if you transfer inventory from one > warehouse to another (US to France) XA assumes that the cost is in the > primary environment currency. > Another issue is the language of the data. If you share items the item > descriptions may need to be in the local language. Even with EPDM and > item revisions there are still a few things that are not enabled and go > back to use the released site (item master). All other data language > needs to be considered. > You will notice that most of the files that contain cost have a user field > for currency ID. We got MAPICS to add that for our customer way back > about 10 years ago. We had 32 sites all around the world that were > sharing one environment. The only reason we had a different environment > was if we needed a different AS/400 because of poor telecommunications > infrastructure in the country. > The Shared Environment solution is a good one. We used the predecessor to > that with Terry Borgert at Progressive Systems help. > If you'd like to discuss this further you can contact me at the number > below - or via email. > > Dee A. Sondergard> Information Systems International, Inc.> A Global ERP Consulting Firm> 815-398-1670 ext 21> > ISI consultants ensure consistently top quality implementation services at > all levels of your organization.> > > > > > From:> mapics-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To:> mapics-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date:> 02/13/2009 09:01 AM> Subject:> MAPICS-L Digest, Vol 7, Issue 18> > > > Send MAPICS-L mailing list submissions to> mapics-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit> http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to> mapics-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > You can reach the person managing the list at> mapics-l-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific> than "Re: Contents of MAPICS-L digest..."> > > Today's Topics:> > 1. Re: MAPICS-L Digest, Vol 7, Issue 17> (michael.ellis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)> 2. new company - seperate environment or share environment> (Jon Le Roi)> 3. Re: new company - seperate environment or share environment> (Pete Olshavsky)> 4. Re: new company - seperate environment or share environment> (douglas emerine)> 5. Re: new company - seperate environment or share environment> (Gindlesperger, Dale)> 6. Re: new company - seperate environment or share environment> (Denroxi@xxxxxxx)> 7. Re: new company - seperate environment or shareenvironment> (Ioffe, Jane [BUL/LAK])> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------> > message: 1> date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:30:10 -0600> from: michael.ellis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> subject: Re: [MAPICS-L] MAPICS-L Digest, Vol 7, Issue 17> > We did it for a customer. It's still in active use. I could discuss > with you offline, if you need some help with it.> > > Michael G. Ellis> Information Systems International, Inc.> A Global ERP Consulting Firm> 815-398-1670 x23> > Choose ISI consultants to ensure consistently top quality implementation > services at all levels of your organization.> > "O tolmon nika", He who dares, wins.> Spartan military saying> > > > From:> mapics-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To:> mapics-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date:> 02/12/2009 12:58 PM> Subject:> MAPICS-L Digest, Vol 7, Issue 17> > > > Send MAPICS-L mailing list submissions to> mapics-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit> http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to> mapics-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > You can reach the person managing the list at> mapics-l-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific> than "Re: Contents of MAPICS-L digest..."> > > Today's Topics:> > 1. Offline load of REP schedules (Cole, Jerry S.)> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------> > message: 1> date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:57:51 -0500> from: "Cole, Jerry S." <Jerry.Cole@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> subject: [MAPICS-L] Offline load of REP schedules> > I know the official Infor line with XAR6 is that there is no offline> load for REP schedules available.> > > > My question to the list is has anyone done this and what was the> complexity level involved?> > > > Jerry Cole > IS Manager, MSSC > (931) 237-6455 > A Joint Venture of ArvinMeritor and Mitsubishi Steel Manufacturing> > > This e-mail message and any attachments may contain > legally privileged, confidential or proprietary Information, or > information otherwise protected by law of ArvinMeritor, Inc., > its affiliates, or third parties. This notice serves as marking of > its ?Confidential? status as defined in any confidentiality > agreements concerning the sender and recipient. If you are > not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or agent > responsible for delivery of this message to the intended > recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly > prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please > immediately notify the sender and delete this e-mail message > from your computer.> > > ------------------------------> > _______________________________________________> This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) digest list> To post a message email: MAPICS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l> or email: MAPICS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives> at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.> > > > End of MAPICS-L Digest, Vol 7, Issue 17> ***************************************> > > > > ------------------------------> > message: 2> date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:24:05 -0800> from: "Jon Le Roi" <jleroi@xxxxxxxxx>> subject: [MAPICS-L] new company - seperate environment or share> environment> > Hello,> > Tegal is on release 5.5 of XA (yeah, alright so we still call it MAPICS> like everyone else)> > In the past, Tegal has created separate environments for each> company/subsidiary that was created. At one point, we had 7 separate> production environments (each with a separate currency). We are down to> 3 active production environments and I have been informed that we will> need to create a new company for a new subsidiary in France (quickly of> course). I am wondering if it would make more sense to add a new company> to our existing primary environment as compared to creating a new> environment. All items exist in the primary environment and then get> created as they are needed into the subsidiaries. This has been> automated to a point but has led to many a problem over the past couple> of years. > > Any thoughts, suggestions, warnings.... would be greatly appreciated.> > TIA> > Jon Le Roi> Director of I.T.> Tegal Corporation > > > > ------------------------------> > message: 3> date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 03:43:21 -0800 (PST)> from: Pete Olshavsky <polshavsky@xxxxxxxxx>> subject: Re: [MAPICS-L] new company - seperate environment or share> environment> > Jon, the only argument is security. Is the new company(france) allowed to > see data in the existing company? can not set up security?by company. > You could have a shared? pgm env. > > pete > Guide Technologies> > > > ________________________________> From: Jon Le Roi <jleroi@xxxxxxxxx>> To: MAPICS ERP System Discussion <mapics-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 7:24:05 PM> Subject: [MAPICS-L] new company - seperate environment or share > environment> > Hello,> > Tegal is on release 5.5 of XA (yeah, alright so we still call it MAPICS> like everyone else)> > In the past, Tegal has created separate environments for each> company/subsidiary that was created. At one point, we had 7 separate> production environments (each with a separate currency). We are down to> 3 active production environments and I have been informed that we will> need to create a new company for a new subsidiary in France (quickly of> course). I am wondering if it would make more sense to add a new company> to our existing primary environment as compared to creating a new> environment. All items exist in the primary environment and then get> created as they are needed into the subsidiaries. This has been> automated to a point but has led to many a problem over the past couple> of years. > > Any thoughts, suggestions, warnings.... would be greatly appreciated.> > TIA> > Jon Le Roi> Director of I.T.> Tegal Corporation? > > _______________________________________________> This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list> To post a message email: MAPICS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l> or email: MAPICS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives> at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.> > ------------------------------> > message: 4> date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:56:40 -0500> from: douglas emerine <emerinedoug@xxxxxxxxxxx>> subject: Re: [MAPICS-L] new company - seperate environment or share> environment> > > Hello> There are several issues that come to play when adding a new company with > a different currency than that of the "local currency".> Will this company have item master costs? If so they will be in the local > currency which will cause issues. Production records will be in the local > currency. CAS security is an issue.> > Watermark has a solution which may assist in this process. It is called > Shared Applications. If you would like additonal information on this, let > me know.Thanks Douglas M. Emerineemerinedoug@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 12 > Feb 2009 16:24:05 -0800> From: jleroi@xxxxxxxxx> To: > mapics-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [MAPICS-L] new company - seperate > environment or share environment> > Hello,> > Tegal is on release 5.5 of > XA (yeah, alright so we still call it MAPICS> like everyone else)> > In > the past, Tegal has created separate environments for each> > company/subsidiary that was created. At one point, we had 7 separate> > production environments (each with a separate currency). We are down to> 3 > active production environments and I have been informed that we will> need > to create a new company for a new subsidiary in France (quickly of> > course). I am wondering if it would make more sense to add a new company> > to our existing primary environment as compared to creating a new> > environment. All i!> tems exist in the primary environment and then get> created as they are > needed into the subsidiaries. This has been> automated to a point but has > led to many a problem over the past couple> of years. > > Any thoughts, > suggestions, warnings.... would be greatly appreciated.> > TIA> > Jon Le > Roi> Director of I.T.> Tegal Corporation > > > _______________________________________________> This is the MAPICS ERP > System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list> To post a message email: > MAPICS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,> > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l> or email: > MAPICS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Before posting, please take a moment to > review the archives> at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.> > _________________________________________________________________> Windows Live?: Keep your life in sync. > http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t1_allup_explore_022009> > ------------------------------> > message: 5> date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:24:00 -0500> from: "Gindlesperger, Dale" <DGindle@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> subject: Re: [MAPICS-L] new company - seperate environment or share> environment> > Jon,> > I'm with Pete O. on this one. I think you would find it a lot cleaner to > have a separate environment (sharing the AMALIBx). Simpler on security, > and all around easier to manage. And you already know how to manage > multiple environments. At my prior employer, for a couple years we added > a product line that was run separate from the rest of the company (that > area ran as a demand-flow shop, unlike the rest of the plant), and it was > a lot easier to keep things separate with two separate environments. It > was easier for the accounting function also.> > We looked hard at setting up a separate company, but decided it would be > harder with all the reporting changes and all - the hundreds of queries > and such were all done assuming company 01. We didn't want to have to > deal with all that - separate data libraries were easier to manage.> > Dale "Cork" Gindlesperger> Senior Business Analyst> > > ------------------------------> > message: 6> date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:41:25 EST> from: Denroxi@xxxxxxx> subject: Re: [MAPICS-L] new company - seperate environment or share> environment> > I do not think 5.5 has IFM capability, but I set up a medical device firm > with offices in Costa Rica, Chile & Argentina in 1 environment employing > the > EPDM feature of 7.0 with the IFM module installed.> Security is per site. If you did not want someone to see data in another > country, security is just like plain vanilla MAPICS as to who you > authorize to > inquire, data enter or file maintenance @ each site.> All 3 countries had different currencies which with IFM were converted to > US > dollars for the headquarters finance geeks on line realtime if necessary.> Once again..5.5 may not have this ability,....and you need EPDM> > > In a message dated 2/13/2009 11:24:33 A.M. Pacific SA Daylight Time, > DGindle@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes:> > Jon,> > I'm with Pete O. on this one. I think you would find it a lot cleaner to > > have a separate environment (sharing the AMALIBx). Simpler on security, > and > all around easier to manage. And you already know how to manage > multiple > environments. At my prior employer, for a couple years we added a > product line > that was run separate from the rest of the company (that area ran as a > demand-flow shop, unlike the rest of the plant), and it was a lot easier > to keep > things separate with two separate environments. It was easier for the > accounting function also.> > We looked hard at setting up a separate company, but decided it would be > harder with all the reporting changes and all - the hundreds of queries > and such > were all done assuming company 01. We didn't want to have to deal with > all > that - separate data libraries were easier to manage.> > Dale "Cork" Gindlesperger> Senior Business Analyst> _______________________________________________> This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list> To post a message email: MAPICS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l> or email: MAPICS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives> at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.> > > > **************The year's hottest artists on the red carpet at the Grammy > Awards. AOL Music takes you there. > (http://music.aol.com/grammys?ncid=emlcntusmusi00000004)> > > ------------------------------> > message: 7> date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:57:39 -0600> from: "Ioffe, Jane [BUL/LAK]" <Jane.Ioffe@xxxxxxxxxxx>> subject: Re: [MAPICS-L] new company - seperate environment or> shareenvironment> > Hello,> Our company Buehler Ltd is on R5.5 and have all the features of IFM> modules installed and Running perfect for us (except some user issues ;)> > We also using Shared Apps, where all Master files are shared and> transactional data are silos. Shared apps is not a quick solution (not> easy to install, but PSI could help you out with that) - but down road> it will bring a lot of benefits. I agree, for this particular task and> time constrains it would be cleaner to create a new environment,> specifically if it requires to have various securities and currencies. > > Thank you and Regards, > Jane Ioffe> 847-295-4593> > -----Original Message-----> From: mapics-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [mailto:mapics-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Denroxi@xxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 8:41 AM> To: mapics-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [MAPICS-L] new company - seperate environment or> shareenvironment> > I do not think 5.5 has IFM capability, but I set up a medical device> firm > with offices in Costa Rica, Chile & Argentina in 1 environment employing> the > EPDM feature of 7.0 with the IFM module installed.> Security is per site. If you did not want someone to see data in another> > country, security is just like plain vanilla MAPICS as to who you> authorize to > inquire, data enter or file maintenance @ each site.> All 3 countries had different currencies which with IFM were converted> to US > dollars for the headquarters finance geeks on line realtime if> necessary.> Once again..5.5 may not have this ability,....and you need EPDM> > > In a message dated 2/13/2009 11:24:33 A.M. Pacific SA Daylight Time, > DGindle@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes:> > Jon,> > I'm with Pete O. on this one. I think you would find it a lot cleaner> to > have a separate environment (sharing the AMALIBx). Simpler on> security, and > all around easier to manage. And you already know how to manage> multiple > environments. At my prior employer, for a couple years we added a> product line > that was run separate from the rest of the company (that area ran as a > demand-flow shop, unlike the rest of the plant), and it was a lot> easier to keep > things separate with two separate environments. It was easier for the > accounting function also.> > We looked hard at setting up a separate company, but decided it would> be > harder with all the reporting changes and all - the hundreds of queries> and such > were all done assuming company 01. We didn't want to have to deal with> all > that - separate data libraries were easier to manage.> > Dale "Cork" Gindlesperger> Senior Business Analyst> _______________________________________________> This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list> To post a message email: MAPICS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l> or email: MAPICS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives> at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.> > > > **************The year's hottest artists on the red carpet at the Grammy> > Awards. AOL Music takes you there. > (http://music.aol.com/grammys?ncid=emlcntusmusi00000004)> _______________________________________________> This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list> To post a message email: MAPICS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l> or email: MAPICS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives> at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.> > > > ------------------------------> > _______________________________________________> This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) digest list> To post a message email: MAPICS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l> or email: MAPICS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives> at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.> > > > End of MAPICS-L Digest, Vol 7, Issue 18> ***************************************> > > _______________________________________________> This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list> To post a message email: MAPICS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l> or email: MAPICS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives> at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.>
_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live™: E-mail. Chat. Share. Get more ways to connect.
http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t2_allup_explore_022009

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.