Re: OFFSHIP not producing SA's - continued

Eric:

We have found that using INTRWU & looking for records with a status of "E" 
works much quicker than using IMHIST/MBCOREP.  We have a bunch of records 
in IMHIST, so that is why we have found INTRWU to be quicker.

We have looked at missing SLQNTY records, not enough inventory in the 
location, etc & nothing comes up as to why.  We are tailored to not allow 
negative & controlled warehouse.

I am still leaning towards corrupted data coming in, since the problem is 
difficult to reproduce & inconsistent.
 
Steve Jones



"Eric Wolf" <eric_a_wolf@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: mapics-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
05/04/2006 11:56 AM
Please respond to
MAPICS ERP System Discussion <mapics-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
"MAPICS ERP System Discussion" <mapics-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Subject
Re: [MAPICS-L] OFFSHIP not producing SA's - continued






Dale,
I have two of my customers using the Offship process and I think the only 
difference is that the warehouse being shipped from are not a controlled 
warehouses.  I created a quick query on Ann's suggestion of linking 
MBCOREP 
and IMHIST and I did not have any missing records.

With controlled warehouses, is it possible that when the record is coming 
in 
that the Location exists but by the time it is being processed, the 
location 
is empty.  I think I read somewhere that when a location has zero 
quantity, 
the SLQNTY record is deleted. Does you install/tailor allow for negative 
quantities?

Just some more food for thought...

Eric


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <DaleGindlesperger@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "MAPICS ERP System Discussion" <mapics-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 8:20 AM
Subject: Re: [MAPICS-L] OFFSHIP not producing SA's - continued


>
>
>
>
>
> Greg, good suggestion except that the odd part about this is that if I
> rerun the records through the process, they generally work!  There's
> something just odd about this flow, apparently.
>
> Dale Gindlesperger
> IT Manager/Special Projects Leader
> Fleetwood Folding Trailers, Inc.
> 258 Beacon Street
> Somerset, PA  15501
>
>
>
>
>
>             "Greg Wenzloff"
>             <GWenzloff@beckmf
>             g.com> To
>             Sent by:                  "MAPICS ERP System Discussion"
>             mapics-l-bounces@         <mapics-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>             midrange.com cc
>
> Subject
>             05/04/2006 10:51          Re: [MAPICS-L] OFFSHIP not
>             AM                        producing SA's - continued
>
>
>             Please respond to
>             MAPICS ERP System
>                Discussion
>             <mapics-l@midrang
>                  e.com>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Ann/Steve/Dale,
>
> Another comment from the bleachers.   I'm intrigued by this problem.
>
> The 2 error messages are a hint that at the time the program checked for
> existence of the part in the ITEMBL file and the SLQNTY file, that the
> part number could have been corrupted and the error condition was valid
> at that time.
>
> I would be tempted to add some lines of code to the program that printed
> or placed in a file the part number at the exact moment of the test for
> the error condition.   If you can confirm that the part number has
> somehow been changed by the program you would be a step closer to
> finding the cause.
>
> Good luck,
> Greg
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mapics-l-bounces+gwenzloff=beckmfg.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:mapics-l-bounces+gwenzloff=beckmfg.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of DaleGindlesperger@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:35 AM
> To: MAPICS ERP System Discussion
> Subject: Re: [MAPICS-L] OFFSHIP not producing SA's - continued
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Ann and Steve,
>
> Horning in here with more from our end - we post some OFFSHIP orders
> immediately (trailers - they are big ticket items), but the majority of
> them are batched through from data provided by UPS and FedEx's systems.
> And we have the problem on both types of processing.
>
> Dale Gindlesperger
> IT Manager/Special Projects Leader
> Fleetwood Folding Trailers, Inc.
> 258 Beacon Street
> Somerset, PA  15501
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MAPICS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l
> or email: MAPICS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MAPICS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l
> or email: MAPICS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.
>
> 
_______________________________________________
This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MAPICS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l
or email: MAPICS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.