|
Their pricing structures in situations like this are just another avenue for Microsoft to exploit. When you combine it with IBM's pricing practices it makes abandoning the platform inevitable. A few years from now we'll see Midrange software companies lining up to sue Microsoft for killing their goose that laid the gilt-tiered egg! Don't get me wrong, there's a lot of good things about MAPICS & IBM, but there's also the point of diminishing returns...... "Joe Perrault" <JRPERRAULT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent by: mapics-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx 02/12/2004 07:08 AM Please respond to MAPICS ERP System Discussion <mapics-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To "MAPICS ERP System Discussion" <mapics-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> cc Subject >From the Believe or Not Department at MAPICS... Here's a laugh I though I would share with the group: We have been a MAPICS user for 24+ years, currently on release 6. Our iSeries box is an 820-2395-1523 (120 interactive CPW - 370 total CPW). We are on tier pricing with MAPICS and have about 70 concurrent users. We do some other things on the box outside of MAPICS. IBM is currently offering some very good upgrade prices on an 820 to 810 upgrade. This upgrade would do several things for us including - Triple the performance to 1070 CPW with no interactive limit as well as lower the IBM software tier from P20 to P10 thus saving us about $7,000 per year in software support and maintenance. For an initial investment of $50K-$60K the ROI looks very good not even considering the performance boost. Here is where it gets funny. I spoke to the troll under the bridge, I mean MAPICS, and asked if there would be any charge from them, hoping that the may have indexed their performance tiers at least once since 1978. Here are the options they gave me: Convert Tier to Tier all current modules to the new machine $1.7M (yes that is an M and would be about $24,000 per user) or convert to concurrent user lisence for $130K. They also proposed a much lower cost option to convert to concurrent users with the MAPICS Essentials package and I am sure there is some value in getting those modules we don't already have but never the less it has probably sunk the deal. What was a relative no brainer $50K decision turns into a $120K plus major capital decision on our part. Joe Perrault _______________________________________________ This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list To post a message email: MAPICS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l or email: MAPICS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.