|
You cannot entirely blame Synon for the file/field naming convention. According to a friend of mine, the field and file names are created by Synon, but prior to creation, the developer has the option of changing those names. Apparently when COM was developed, they chose not to change them. FYI, has anyone noticed that there is no consistency with the S0 Update Index, S1 Retrieval Index? There was a bug in the version of Synon during the initial development that alternated the naming of these indexes that also could/should have been caught prior to releasing of the product. (According to my same source). Just a piece of useless information for the day... Eric
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.