Re: Question Re: Browser response time

["Jeff Snyder" <jeffreygsnyder@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

   That's what I was going to say !!  I concur.  How bout you Cork ??

   Jeff Snyder, CPIM

   Mapics Consultant ( roustabout)

    

   From: michael.franchino@xxxxxxxxxx
   Reply-To: MAPICS ERP System Discussion <MAPICS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
   To: MAPICS ERP System Discussion <MAPICS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
   CC: <MAPICS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
   Subject: Re: Question Re: Browser response time
   Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 12:05:51 -0400
   Network infrastructure is big.. If you are using multiple hubs = daisy
   chained together instead of using network switches attached using a b
   ackbone is also very big.. Browser sends a lot of data back/forth with
   mult= iple requests, so lag time can also hinder your response.
   If you are in a WAN type environemnt, CITRIX or Terminal Server is a mu ch
   better fit. Using that here at our customer in Switzerland with 80
   users= in Switzerland and 80 users in US on 9 CITRIX servers.. Works very
   well.. = Browser was unusable from a regular network attachment whereas
   CITRIX works= very nicely now.
   We also added Green Screen, EW= P, frx and analytics all on the same
   servers. Management is nice, performan= ce is nice.. We are really only
   using 3 physical servers using VMWARE to sp= lit them up into 3 servers.
   Very nice and low TCO especially if they = needed to buy 150+ new PCs that
   were 5+ years old and now they don't.
   </= DIV>
   Michael Franchino
   Custom Systems Corpora= tion
   http://www.cussys.com
   (973) 726-0202 X214 (Phone) (973) 726-4552 (Fax)
   -----mapics-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: -----
   To: <= ;mapics-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
   From: "Mike Smith" <MIKE_SMITH@xxxxxxx&G= DIV Sent by:
   mapics-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
   Date: 09/24/2003 11:53AM<BR=>Subject: Re: Question Re: Browser response
   time
   Skip, We found her= e that, as Mike Crawford stated earlier, the 100MB
   network cards and lin= es are critical to Browser performance. I would
   find it hard to believe= that your 400 is the bottleneck in your stated
   environment. Make sure = 400 nics and PC nics are capable of 100MB, we
   found that to be an issue = on some PCs here. You may want to have
   someone perform a network throug= hput test to insure transmission speed
   isn't the issue, many small servi= ce companies will do this on the cheap.
   Also keeping 400 file sizes in = check is important. Good Luck.
   _____________ _________________________ _________
   This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MA= PICS-L) mailing list
   To post a message email: MAPICS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
   T= o subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
   visit: http://list= s.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l
   or email: MAPICS-L-request@= midrange.com
   Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http=
   ://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.
   _______________________________________________
   This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list
   To post a message email: MAPICS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
   To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
   visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l
   or email: MAPICS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
   Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
   at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.

     ----------------------------------------------------------------------

   Instant message with integrated webcam using MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now
   FREE