|
Mapics has invested both time and money to create those 4600+ PTFs. I find that commitment preferable to another company that has only a few PTFs and worse support. No application is perfect, nor ever will be - that is the reality of software development. You say 4600+ PTFs like it's a bad thing <g>. Just my $.02, -Greg Gregory Novak Manager North American Technical Services Momentum Utilities Pty Ltd (630) 985-1736 gnovak@xxxxxxxxxx www.jacana.com -----Original Message----- From: Konrad Underkofler [mailto:kdunderk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 7:49 AM To: 'MAPICS ERP System Discussion' Subject: RE: RE: Mapics data extract Oh well, I just have to Paola... > It is a good solid product PTF 4600+ and counting. R7 dead in water. We just had to download Rev 33 of the client so we could delete an item in EPDM! This is a product that has been out for several years, how can it not delete items? > and is continually being updated as business needs change. I think I missed that. COM needs a complete rethink and rewrite. The last real MAPICS app was REP done back in 90 or 91? Otherwise the functionality is the same as it was this past decade. Most of the goodness resides in the Mfg area, but flexibility is not included. > On the other hand, with MAPICS you have a full customer support team > to help guide you through problems, training, and issues. So even though you have employees coming and going over the years, you still have the support team at MAPICS to help support your users. If they have not been laid off yet. MAPICS XA is clearly not MAPICS Inc strategic application set anymore following years of effort, all semi-successful to get off green screen AS/400 and its associated costs. I believe most MAPICS development is being done in India now. So, in answer to the data extract question. 1) Whatever version of MAPICS you have is probably just like the current one in function with the exception of COM replacing OEI. My advice stick with it. Depending on what release you are on, the upgrade path may be brutal. In any case the older versions (ie pre COM) are good efficient machine users and do not require outlandish CPW ratings to function. 2) Extracting data is more practical if you just get the customer and items (ie CUSMAS and ITEMAS) and then cut over and start again. Run the existing system till all transactions have cleared while bringing up the new one merging the results on paper. 3) Custom programs are far easier now than they used to be if you requirements don't fit MAPICS well. You will easily spend enough in license fees, upgrades, mods, consulting to make the custom solution doable in a lot of cases. Regards Konrad
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.