|
The problem with a separate warehouse is that M-orders are warehouse specific so there won't be any components available to issue without first transfering them to the other warehouse (and creating duplicate item balance records, etc.) - very messy. Availability is the biggest concern and as long as the MO is released soon after receipt of the returned item, that's taken care of. Yes, the "usage" numbers will be affected but these numbers are suspect anyway because ANY transaction will affect them including misc and adjustments so I think this is a small price to pay. As far as costing, the MO will accrue costs that will be removed from the WIP database when the order is purged. I can't see where this would be a problem. I'm assuming that you put enough identity in the order header to be able to break it out easily (special alpha/numeric order number, etc. as suggested by Dale) from the regular production orders. The actual cost will be higher than standard because the component (the item itself) is the full item cost, plus you'll add whatever rework costs are applied - but isn't that the whole point? Good discussion thread, by the way. This is a great forum for exchanging info and experiences. Dave Turbide dave@daveturbide.com Message: 5 Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 08:34:58 -0500 From: Jeff.Anderson@Hayssen.com Subject: RE: Reporting Rework This is a good solution, but also brings up an additional problem. If this is performed in the main warehouse, the usage will be affected by the issues and receipts. Also, if you are using standard costing, the cost will be affected. -----Original Message----- From: Dave Turbide [mailto:dave@daveturbide.com] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 7:58 AM To: mapics-l@midrange.com Subject: RE: Reporting Rework Tom - Items that come back from customers should be treated as follows (different from regular in-house rework): Receive the item into stock through a return (order entry) or miscellaneous receipt. You might want to use a special location so it doesn't get mixed in with "good" product. Issue a manufacturing order for the item with B/M "no" and list the item itself as the required component. Issue the item to the MO. Add whatever operations you need and unplanned issue the materials needed. By putting the item on the MO as a component to itself, inventory and planning will see that it will be available at the completion of the MO but is not available in its un-reworked state. Dave Turbide dave@daveturbide.com Message: 6 Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 16:37:34 -0500 From: "Tom Wood" <TomW@fortrecoveryindustries.com> Subject: RE: Reporting Rework Thanks Joan, How do you handle rework for parts AFTER the originating MO is closed? For example if parts come back from a customer (ouch!)needing some rework done. Thanks, Tom -----Original Message----- Dave Turbide, CFPIM, CMfgE, CIRM Market Analysis and Communication 883 Ocean Blvd Hampton, NH 03842 phone(603) 926-1435 fax (603) 926-0862 www.daveturbide.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.