×

Good News Everybody!

A new search engine is coming soon.

As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.




We have taken care of the BOM's and routings and we have new MO's and
PO's with the new numbers.

-----Original Message-----
From: Pete [mailto:peteo@htol.net]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 2:21 PM
To: mapics-l@midrange.com
Subject: Re: Overlaying the item number in SLQNTY

George,
    Unless I missed something.. You have a bigger job than what you
described... What about Pstruc, Routng, Imhist, Momast, Modata, Pomast,
poitem, pocomt, the list goes on..
You could do it with a pgm.. and a xref file (Old item --- New item)
Good Luck
Pete Olshavsky
Ind Mapics Programmer/Systems Analyst

----- Original Message -----
From: "Shannon, George" <GShannon@BDFUSA.com>
To: <mapics-l@midrange.com>
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 1:54 PM
Subject: Overlaying the item number in SLQNTY


> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> --
> [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> First, a little backround before I share our idea.  We are on Rel 5.0
> and have only the basic inventory modules (IM PDM PCC MRP PUR PMC).
We
> have controlled warehouses with batch/lot control and FIFO dating.
>
> We are in the process of wanting to re-label our inventory to new item
> numbers.  However, there is a bunch of inventory records in various
> stages of QC status (and don't for get FIFO dating).  We know what the
> new item numbers are and have ITEMAS records set up for them.  We want
> to know if we could just write a program to read the SLQNTY for the
old
> item numbers and overlay the item number field with the new item
number.
> We know we will also have to write a program to fix the ITEMBL records
> also (for the qty on hand), but our main dilemma making sure that the
> inventory records in SLQNTY are correct.  We do not discreetly
allocate
> inventory and we do not use the barcoding function within MAPICS, so I
> don't think we need to worry about the turnaround number fields.  Our
> main concerns are:
> 1. How the order number is used on the SLQNTY records.
> 2. Is there any tie-back to the LIFITR file?
>
> PS.  By the way, what is the LIFITR file and what is it used for?
>
> I would appreciate any feedback.
>
> George Shannon
> Manager of Applications
> Beiersdorf Inc.,
> (203) 854-8224
> (203) 854-8244 (fax)
> gshannon@bdfusa.com
> _______________________________________________
> This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MAPICS-L@midrange.com
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/mapics-l
> or email: MAPICS-L-request@midrange.com
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.
>
>

_______________________________________________
This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MAPICS-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/mapics-l
or email: MAPICS-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.