|
Ed, We have the basically the same machine as you do (only 1.5 GB Main Storage), running basically the same Mapics modules, home grown OEI and Trusted Link. We also use the same machine for Domino. Performance is very good. You should be fine for some time. I'm not sure that the migration to the GUI paradigm will require greater resources, just different ones. I'd be looking at your communications infrastructure as well as your batch computing power as to how to size your resources. Your Mapics BP should be a great place to start. Good Luck, Mark Mark Walter Sr. Programmer/Analyst Hanover Wire Cloth a div of CCX, Inc. mwalter@hanoverwire.com http://www.hanoverwire.com 717.637.3795 Ext.3040 "Heller, Ed" <eheller@defianceprec To: MAPICS-L@midrange.com ision.com> cc: Sent by: Subject: Fitting MAPICS to the AS/400 mapics-l-admin@midran ge.com 09/14/01 12:12 PM Please respond to mapics-l Greetings, All! As part of a merger, we are in the process of moving from JBA (oops, GEAC) System21 to MAPICS, which is already in use at the sister company into which we're being merged. While I confess to being a MAPICS novice, one of my large concerns is the decision to retain the current AS/400 that is in place. And, am wondering what this group could relate from their experience and knowledge, or point me towards an appropriate reference source. Currently, we have a 9406-720; IBM Tier P10; MAPICS Tier 8; CPW Rating 35/240; and, 768MB of Memory. As far as the majors go, we'll be implementing IFM, Purchasing, Inventory, PDM, PC&C, PM&C, and MRP. In addition will be an E-Kanban application, a homegrown data collection application, and Future3 being used for EDI, Order Entry, and Invoicing. COM and/or EPDM may be added sometime in the next couple of years. While I know this list doesn't address things like number of transactions, I do need to start somewhere. I suppose an adjunct question in my mind concerns MAPICS' plans for the future. The little information I've seen seems to imply that many of their future upgrades/enhancements will be oriented toward GUI, with a corresponding need for greater resources. Thanks in advance for any of you thoughts. I've had the privilege of lurking in this discussion group for the last four weeks or so, and have been quite impressed by the levels of knowledge, cooperation, and especially the concern for your employers' best interest that I've been seeing. Thanks! Ed ============================= Edward B. Heller IS Manager Defiance Precision Products 419-782-8955 x496 eheller@defianceprecision.com ============================= _______________________________________________ This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list To post a message email: MAPICS-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/mapics-l or email: MAPICS-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.