RE: attaching the userid to inventory batches

["Shaw, David" <dshaw@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Forwarded by moderator for Tim Strange <tms@westernenterprises.com>:

***************************************

Why not restrict User Id's to device ID's.  We have chosen to only allow
users to sign on at their terminal or CA session only.  So when we look at
Imhist we know who performed the transaction.  Of course this only works if
users do not share their passwords.  

-----Original Message-----
From: Shannon, George [mailto:GShannon@bdfusa.com]
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2000 8:55 AM
To: 'MAPICS-L@midrange.com'
Subject: RE: attaching the userid to inventory batches


We have the same problem here.  We are looking to be audited by the FDA and
one of our accountabilities is to trace back transactions to the operator.
The Operator ID on the inventory batches does not get logged on the
transactions neither.  Therefore we are looking to modify AMI3H (program
which adds records to IMHIST) to populate the user id in the WSID field on
IMHIST.

        -----Original Message----- 
From:   ChrisGinaNeely@aol.com [SMTP:ChrisGinaNeely@aol.com] 
Sent:   Thursday, June 29, 2000 10:48 PM 
To:     mapics-l@midrange.com 
Subject:        attaching the userid to inventory batches 

        I am trying to find a way to attach the user ID to inventory batches
instead 
of the job name (qpadev0008 for example) so that we know who entered the 
batch.  Has anyone else had a need to do this? What was your method? 

        Thanks 
Chris 
+---
| This is the MAPICS Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MAPICS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MAPICS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MAPICS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: dshaw@spartan.com
+---