Re: Prefered Linux Dialect...

Yeah, our main DNS server was running on a P90 with slackware
installed. Was up for like 400+ days.

Hey, you could always back up to floppies! I heard they got like 3mb
floppies out now!


On 5/2/05, Peter Grace <pgrace@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> A good portion of my data center here is recycled old systems running
> linux for one purpose or another.  I'm looking into running an LPAR or
> two on our new 520 to make use of some of the excess juice our
> developers aren't going to need, while giving me an easier backup
> strategy than what we currently have in place.
> 
> I'd much rather use our industrial-grade AS/400 50gig tape backup than
> the hodge-podge of cd burners and travan drives we've got sitting around
> at the moment.
> 
> Pete
> 
> JRB Technology wrote:
> > Why not just install Linux on a sperate box. All you need is an old PC
> > if you want to play with it. It might be cheaper to buy a simple
> > server with Linux then to spend a lot of time configuring it to run on
> > the AS400 hardware.....
> >
> > -jim
> >
> >
> > On 5/2/05, Peter Grace <pgrace@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >>Hello everyone!
> >>
> >>I thought I'd put my two cents in as well.  I'm not too guru-like on my
> >>400 knowledge (still a relative admin newbie) but I've been using Linux
> >>since '95 and I'd have to say that I'd prefer SuSE over Red Hat.
> >>
> >>It's just always seemed to me that the SuSE people "had their stuff
> >>together" whereas many redhat releases have always seemed cobbled
> >>together at the last minute.  Although I have a few friends that work
> >>for RedHat, I do have to tip my head to the SuSE crew, since they've
> >>always seemed to be the quiet innovators who deliver a solid distro.
> >>
> >>If I had my choice, I'd run Debian on an LPAR, but as far as I know
> >>there's no debian project yet for the '400.
> >>
> >>Pete
> >>
> >>
> >>Larry Bolhuis wrote:
> >>
> >>>I believe IBM's favorite is Suse. They use Suse as the base for the HMC
> >>>code. I get the impression from those in Rochester that it is the
> >>>preferred distro also.
> >>>
> >>>But I disagree. My preference is RH as it seems the distro of choice
> >>>here in the US. I have 10 to 1 RH to Suse on the servers I work on.
> >>>Although if you think IBM's key management is bad, holy mackerel try RH.
> >>>
> >>>My .02
> >>>
> >>> - Larry
> >>>
> >>>Don wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Jim/Larry, et al...
> >>>>
> >>>>you can now get both Red Hat and Suse to run on iSeries LPAR...  Which
> >>>>one
> >>>>is the prefered and why?
> >>>>
> >>>>tks
> >>>>
> >>>>Don in DC
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>--
> >>No virus found in this outgoing message.
> >>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> >>Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.1 - Release Date: 5/2/2005
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>This is the Linux/400 Discussion (LINUX400) mailing list
> >>To post a message email: LINUX400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> >>visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/linux400
> >>or email: LINUX400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> >>at http://archive.midrange.com/linux400.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > This is the Linux/400 Discussion (LINUX400) mailing list
> > To post a message email: LINUX400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/linux400
> > or email: LINUX400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> > at http://archive.midrange.com/linux400.
> >
> 
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.1 - Release Date: 5/2/2005
> 
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Linux/400 Discussion (LINUX400) mailing list
> To post a message email: LINUX400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/linux400
> or email: LINUX400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/linux400.
> 
>