× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.




Peter,

this brings up a interesting point...that being the lack of
standardization of linux.  It's fast become vendor centric in that if
your package is designed around a specific flavour of linux, then that's
what you're going to have to use...or you can run multiple servers with
multiple dialects and hope for the best....

I"m noticing this at my kid's school...we pulled all the M$ crap out of
the classroom with the exception of K and put ltsp in.  Kids and staff
love it.  But we've got Koha (library) that requires debian, ltsp that's
basically red hat....and I'm not going to bring in Suse to make me even
more schitzoid!   And on top of that I still had to maintain a small M$
presence as the core school app runs on MS Server 2003....  OY!

:)

Don in DC

-------------------------------------------------

On Mon, 2 May 2005, Peter Grace wrote:

> Hello everyone!
>
> I thought I'd put my two cents in as well.  I'm not too guru-like on my
> 400 knowledge (still a relative admin newbie) but I've been using Linux
> since '95 and I'd have to say that I'd prefer SuSE over Red Hat.
>
> It's just always seemed to me that the SuSE people "had their stuff
> together" whereas many redhat releases have always seemed cobbled
> together at the last minute.  Although I have a few friends that work
> for RedHat, I do have to tip my head to the SuSE crew, since they've
> always seemed to be the quiet innovators who deliver a solid distro.
>
> If I had my choice, I'd run Debian on an LPAR, but as far as I know
> there's no debian project yet for the '400.
>
> Pete
>
>
>
> Larry Bolhuis wrote:
> > I believe IBM's favorite is Suse. They use Suse as the base for the HMC
> > code. I get the impression from those in Rochester that it is the
> > preferred distro also.
> >
> > But I disagree. My preference is RH as it seems the distro of choice
> > here in the US. I have 10 to 1 RH to Suse on the servers I work on.
> > Although if you think IBM's key management is bad, holy mackerel try RH.
> >
> > My .02
> >
> >  - Larry
> >
> > Don wrote:
> >
> >> Jim/Larry, et al...
> >>
> >> you can now get both Red Hat and Suse to run on iSeries LPAR...  Which
> >> one
> >> is the prefered and why?
> >>
> >> tks
> >>
> >> Don in DC
> >>
> >
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.1 - Release Date: 5/2/2005
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Linux/400 Discussion (LINUX400) mailing list
> To post a message email: LINUX400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/linux400
> or email: LINUX400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/linux400.
>


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.