We use Tomcat for windows server for servlet req/res, and WAS implementation on i.

What is the actual reason for us to move to Glassfish if we have tomcat for windows & WAS for i? Are there any real benefits?

Thanks, Murali.

-----Original Message-----
From: java400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:java400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Pete Helgren
Sent: 10 September 2010 15:08
To: Java Programming on and around the IBM i
Subject: Re: Glassfish 3.0.1 on the AS/400.

Everybody pretty much covered what I would have chimed in with. Your question might have been better phrased as "What would be the benefits of Glassfish over something like WAS?" What has impressed me in the Windows deployments I have done, is the easy of installation, update, deployment and management. All those items seem pretty straightforward on GF and it all has worked very well (the exception being the i implementation which I am now making progress on).

Pete Helgren
Value Added Software, Inc
www.valadd.com


On 9/9/2010 9:08 PM, Richard Schoen wrote:
Just curious.

What do you see are the benefits of Glassfish over something like
Tomcat ?

Regards,
Richard Schoen
RJS Software Systems Inc.
Where Information Meets Innovation
Document Management, Workflow, Report Delivery, Forms and Business
Intelligence
Email: richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web Site: http://www.rjssoftware.com
Tel: (952) 736-5800
Fax: (952) 736-5801
Toll Free: (888) RJSSOFT


--
This is the Java Programming on and around the IBM i (JAVA400-L) mailing list To post a message email: JAVA400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l
or email: JAVA400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l.



Consider the environment and think before you print this email.

Registered Address: Fortis House Tollgate Eastleigh Hampshire SO53 3YA Registered Number: 354568 England
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority

This e-mail together with any attachments are intended for the addressee only and may be private and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, or the person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you must not open any attachments, or copy, disclose, distribute, retain or use this e-mail, including any attachments, in any way whatsoever; please return it to us immediately using the reply facility on e-mail.

Consider the environment and think before you print this email.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.