RE: using java for stored procedures (Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen)

[Mike Cunningham <mike.cunningham@xxxxxxx>]

Hasn't the JVM always been 64-bit and the newer one is a 32-bit version?

-----Original Message-----
From: java400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:java400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alan Campin
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:44 PM
To: Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400
Subject: Re: using java for stored procedures (Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen)

Just curious. It was even that slow using the new 64-bit JVM running in PASE
or that running the Classic JVM?

The new JVM is supposed to be so much faster.


On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Bruce Jin <brucej@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> Our past experience seemed to suggest that Java stored procedures
> implemented on AS400 could be very slow compared with SQL/RPG/CL
> procedures.
>  Our tests showed that it could be 10 - 50 times slower. We did tests on
> tables with a few dozen records to a few dozen million records. Tested on
> V6R1.
>
> It would be interesting to know if this is true on your box.
>
>  Bruce
> --
> This is the Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400 (JAVA400-L)
> mailing list
> To post a message email: JAVA400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l
> or email: JAVA400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l.