Re: Java and OO Concepts

Well, I guess I'm basing it on a file. The file obviously has a lot more
information than that, but the InventoryClass is used a lot for various
sorting or selections.

I would consider it an Item "has a" inventory class.

At this point we support 2 main ERP packages. One stores the inventory class
as a numeric field and the other as a string. The idea behind the generics
is that I would define 1 Item class and have it constructed with the correct
(Integer or String) generic type.

Like I said, I could be way off. I don't really have any other Java
developers I work with and I'm still learning myself. While I know there are
loads of Java examples out there, I don't ever really see any good
production code. So I apologize if this is kind of a dumb question.

--
James R. Perkins


On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 11:36, Dan Kimmel <dkimmel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I'm having trouble understanding what it is you're trying to do. What is
the relationship between Item and InventoryClass? Is it a "has a" or "is
a" relationship. If it is "is a" then you want Item to extend (or
implement) InventoryClass. What classes are you thinking about using for
E when you instantiate InventoryClass?

-----Original Message-----
From: java400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:java400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of James Perkins
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 1:04 PM
To: Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400
Subject: Java and OO Concepts

Hi All,
Just looking for a little advice here. I'm trying to (still) wrap my
head around OO design.

I'm working on an application for order entry. I want to take a list of
items and turn them into an order. Not really a big deal, but just the
high level overview.

I have a class Item that looks something like this, mainly the
properties is where my question is.
public class Item {
private boolean active;
private String description;
private int inventoryClass;
private String ean;
private int inventorySubclass;
private String itemNumber;
private String keywords;
private String uom;
private String upc;
private double weight;
...
}

I'm wondering now, if inventoryClass should now be a new class
InventoryClass same with inventorySubclass and uom. Make it more generic
has I could make it more generic like so:
public final class InventoryClass<E> {
private final E inventoryClass;

public InventoryClass(E inventoryClass) {
this.inventoryClass = inventoryClass;
}

public final E getInventoryClass() {
return inventoryClass;
}
}

So, my question is this. Am I heading down the right track? Am I
thinking to RPG/procedural programming like?

Any advice is welcome.

Thanks in advance,
--
James R. Perkins

P.S.
If anybody is interested I have created a List factory class that will
return a generic version of a List without having to infer the generics
on the static factory method.
Example:
List<String> list = newArrayList();
If anybody is interested, I'm willing to share. I'm almost done with a
Map one too.
--
This is the Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400
(JAVA400-L) mailing list To post a message email: JAVA400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l
or email: JAVA400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l.



--
This is the Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400 (JAVA400-L)
mailing list
To post a message email: JAVA400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l
or email: JAVA400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l.