× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 6:39 PM, Mike Cunningham <mcunning@xxxxxxx> wrote:
We have a DB2/400 database table with a timestamp field that has the value of 12/31/9999. DB2 is happy with that. I have a PC based java application using the jt400 jdbc driver to read that file and the result set appears to return a null value for that date. If the date is changed to 12/31/2008 it is returned correctly, put back to 12/31/9999 and it's null. Could the jt400 driver be doing this?


Hi Mike,

It could be any number of things & it's really hard to help without
seeing the relevant code...

Just a guess, but are you by any chance using a java.sql.Date object?
If so, have a look at the javadocs which specify that the date is "not
to exceed the milliseconds representation for the year 8099".

http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/java/sql/Date.html#Date(long)

--
Carl.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.