Good News Everybody!
The new search engine is LIVE!
Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.
|
"cornelius, chad" wrote: > > Barbara, > > I did get the example to work from the link you provided. However, the > first call to a Java method still takes around 15+ seconds. We are using > JDK 1.4. I am not sure if that's a problem or not since the JNI Module > defines OS400_JVM_12. Do your method calls perform quickly? > Do you mean that after you manually started the JVM, then the first method call after that took 15+ seconds but subsequent calls were faster? I would have expected the "start JVM" part to take 15+ seconds and then all method calls to be relatively fast. I don't think there is any way to speed up the starting of the JVM. JDK 1.4 should be fine with OS400_JVM_12. The Java invocation API changed between JDK 1.1 and 1.2, but it's still the same as the 1.2 JDK for all subsequent JDKs; by defining OS400_JVM_12 you are just saying you are using the newer form of the invocation API.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.