|
I have no direct data on that question, John. Here's an interesting thing, though: the iSeries benchmarks all specified "AS/400 Developer's Kit for Java", while the i5 test stated simply "IBM Developer Kit for Java". Note no specific AS/400 label. This ties in with rumors I've heard of IBM going to a single JVM for all their boxes. I wonder if the AS/400-specific JVM (which supported things like adopted authority) simply never got the same attention to performance that the "standard" IBM JVM got, and finally the powers that be decided to stuff the jet-fueled JVM into the i5 as well. It would be interesting to know if the JVM in the PTF is now a generic JVM. Joe > From: jthompson@xxxxxxxxxxx > > Joe, is 1.4.1 that much slower than 1.4.2?
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
