|
Hi, talking 'bout application servers, this is minimized by bringing this overhead to the startup of the application server for expensive objects. BTW optimizing at runtime will be more effective in future technologies than static optomization ever was. Dieter David Gibbs schrieb: > "Mark Phippard" > <MarkP=sC2JmdVpHGPwvR0lvYjcXw@public.gmane.org> wrote in > message > news:OF707E3787.1B823048-ON85256C67.0053B923-85256C67.00546169@softlanding.c > om... > > Actually most of the IBM'ers I have heard speak about > this issue say that > > the JIT compiler is the direction of the future. It > already produces code > > that is comparable to optimization level 40 and will > only get better. > > But do you encounter the code generation overhead every > time your class is > invoked? > > david > > > > > _______________________________________________ > This is the Java Programming on and around the iSeries / > AS400 (JAVA400-L) mailing list > To post a message email: JAVA400-L@midrange.com > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: > http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/java400-l > or email: JAVA400-L-request@midrange.com > Before posting, please take a moment to review the > archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l. > >
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.