× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



There is also putty for windows at
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/


>From: "Duane Kehoe" <dkehoe@weycogroup.com>
>Reply-To: java400-l@midrange.com
>To: <java400-l@midrange.com>
>Subject: RE: Secure Telnet? (client-side Java)
>Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 16:06:52 -0500
>
>Telnet is not secure and has no ssl capabilities.  You will need to get ssh
>for windows.  We use Penguinet to ssh from windows to our other systems
>like
>iSeries and the *nixs.
>
>______________________________________________________________
>
>Duane Kehoe                                                   phone:
>414.908.1814
>Programmer / Analyst                                       fax:
>414.908.1601
>Weyco Group, Inc.                                           email:
>dkehoe@weycogroup.com
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: java400-l-admin@midrange.com
>[mailto:java400-l-admin@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Jim Langston
>Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 3:42 PM
>To: 'java400-l@midrange.com'
>Subject: RE: Secure Telnet? (client-side Java)
>
>
>Well, have you tried using Window's Telnet client to connect?
>
>Start->Run-> Telnet MyHost 992
>
>Regards,
>
>Jim Langston
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: jamesl@hb.quik.com [mailto:jamesl@hb.quik.com]
>Some days ago, I asked about my telnet client getting an immediate EOF when
>
>connecting to what is purportely the secure telnet port on a customer's
>AS/400.
>
>I got a suggestion (a head-slap obvious one, really) that I see
>what happens if
>I add a delay of a few seconds between connecting the socket
>and reading from
>the stream.
>
>Even with a 15-second delay, I still get an
>EOF on the first read. The theory
>that the customer's Port 992 either isn't
>secure telnet at all, or is either
>nonstandard or broken, is looking more
>and more likely to be correct, but is
>there another explanation? Or is there
>a quick and easy way to tell one way or
>another whether 992 really is secure
>telnet, or if it's something
>else?
>
>--
>J.Lampert
>_______________________________________________
>This is the Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400 (JAVA400-L)
>mailing list
>To post a message email: JAVA400-L@midrange.com
>To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
>visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/java400-l
>or email: JAVA400-L-request@midrange.com
>Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
>at http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l.
>
>_______________________________________________
>This is the Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400 (JAVA400-L)
>mailing list
>To post a message email: JAVA400-L@midrange.com
>To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
>visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/java400-l
>or email: JAVA400-L-request@midrange.com
>Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
>at http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l.
>



_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.