|
> From: Jim Mason > > WebFacing has certain design goals on how they > manage DDS edits, cross browser architecture, NLS etc > they've had to meet . This is a crucial point, I think. IBM by definition needs broader scope than my product. While we have similar keyword support, WebFacing has more than PSC400 (primarily in the area advanced editing keywords). IBM also needs to support more languages and browsers than I have to. And PSC400 modifies the program source. There's no way around that for a third-party guy like me, and it's a deal breaker for some people. So, as Jim points out, there are really two different niches here, and WebFacing and PSC400 each fit one quite nicely. Joe
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.