|
user1 does the following: 1) setTransactionIsolation(4) (repeatable read) 2) setAutoCommit(false) 3) execute 'select' statement to retrieve list 4) execute 'select' statement to retrieve 1 record 5) execute 'update' statement to lock record (dummy update) user2 does the following: 1) setTransactionIsolation(4) (repeatable read) 2) setAutoCommit(false) 3) execute 'select' statement to retrieve same list this statement give an exception (lock) Both user have their own connection/transaction. I want user 1 to lock the record for update but user2 should be able to read them... I understood that TransactionIsolation(4) locks a record when update/delete without commit()/rollback(). Now it seems that records are lock for reading also?
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
