|
Please read mail 'URGENT please : Locked records' also. The record is available when using 'select...' statement when I execute the methods from within VAJAVA, not when executed from webapp... The intention is to 'lock' for updating only! thanks "Fred Kulack" <kulack@us.ibm.com To: java400-l@midrange.com > cc: Sent by: Subject: Re: no sql-select after sql-update? java400-l-admin@mi drange.com 12/10/2001 15:39 Please respond to java400-l Sure. Repeatable read also means that you're going to be able to read the record again and get the same values for the rows. If its locked for update, you can't be allowed to read it or the data you read may change (depending on whether the transaction that updated changes the record again, or just does rollback or commit. In every single ethnic, religious or racial group, there are a very few truly evil people. For each of those people there are many, many, many good people. Assuming anything (evilness or capability for evil) about the particular group is bigotry and idiocy. Don't do it. -- Me Fred A. Kulack - AS/400e Java and Java DB2 access, Jdbc, JTA, etc... IBM in Rochester, MN (Phone: 507.253.5982 T/L 553-5982) mailto:kulack@us.ibm.com Personal: mailto:kulack@magnaspeed.net AOL Instant Messenger: Home:FKulack Work:FKulackWrk P.Goovaerts@Clipper.Be@midrange.com on 10/12/2001 02:13:05 AM Please respond to java400-l@midrange.com Sent by: java400-l-admin@midrange.com To: java400-l@midrange.com cc: Subject: no sql-select after sql-update? user1 does the following: 1) setTransactionIsolation(4) (repeatable read) 2) setAutoCommit(false) 3) execute 'select' statement to retrieve list 4) execute 'select' statement to retrieve 1 record 5) execute 'update' statement to lock record (dummy update) user2 does the following: 1) setTransactionIsolation(4) (repeatable read) 2) setAutoCommit(false) 3) execute 'select' statement to retrieve same list this statement give an exception (lock) Both user have their own connection/transaction. I want user 1 to lock the record for update but user2 should be able to read them... I understood that TransactionIsolation(4) locks a record when update/delete without commit()/rollback(). Now it seems that records are lock for reading also? _______________________________________________ This is the Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400 (JAVA400-L) mailing list To post a message email: JAVA400-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/java400-l or email: JAVA400-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l. _______________________________________________ This is the Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400 (JAVA400-L) mailing list To post a message email: JAVA400-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/java400-l or email: JAVA400-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.