RE: VisualAge for Java

["Joe Pluta" <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Concurrent access is a flawed concept in OO, IMO.  Separate development
trees is also flawed in an OO design; wrapper classes should be used
instead.  There is never a reason to have two versions of the same class,
with the exception of platform-specific implementations, which of course
should be VERY limited.

I can't think of a single reason I would ever WANT to have two designers
modifying the same class simultaneously, unless my projects were under
untenable time deadlines, or my class hierarchy was incorrect and I had
classes doing more than one basic function.  Under extreme circumstances
this may happen, but it should definitely not be a standard development
procedure.

As to split threads, I think it's a technique that requires VERY careful
scrutiny.  Other than for platform optimization, as mentioned above,
separate development threads are unnecessary in object-oriented programming,
unless you're talking about prototyping, and even then you should be using
encapsulation to separate the new code and the old code.  Direct
modification of a base class without having finished prototyping (and
thereby having collapsed the design tree) is, in my opinion, a direct path
to disaster.

Joe


Jim Mason wrote:
> There is a REAL model for management of classes.
> It DOES allow for concurrent access.
> It also allows, if needed, for split thread development where necessary.

+---
| This is the JAVA/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to JAVA400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to JAVA400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to JAVA400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: joe@zappie.net
+---