|
Hi Richard - >Generally, we try to stay away from doing any >modification to the user SQL that comes through >because its always more dangerous than it first >appears. >What do people think? Should the JDBC driver >check for this clause and append it if missing? I think this situation is a perfect occasion to apply the philosophy expressed in the first quote. If the user wants to update, the user should say so. Ken Southern Wine and Spirits of Nevada, Inc. Opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily represent the views of my employer or anyone in their right mind. +--- | This is the JAVA/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to JAVA400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to JAVA400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to JAVA400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner: joe@zappie.net +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.