• Subject: Re: Re JBuilder
  • From: "Marshall Dunbar" <marshall@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 21 May 1998 07:24:57 -0500

> Depends on the version of Jbuilder. I have found Jbuilder 1.xx -- Pro to
> 'bloat'
> the code. However, using the Sun JDK instead I get much better performing

> code. I
> also reduce the number of potential problems by removing Jbuilder from
the
> 'mix'.
> Look at your imports. Try to only import what you need. Instead of import
> java.io.* use  import java.io.DataStream.*. I realize the IDE is
> wonderful, but,
> we aren't getting to the 'write once, run anywhere' goal with Jbuilder.
Changing the import statement as you suggest will have no effect on the
compiled class file.  The "import" is simply a compiler directive that
limits the set of classes it looks for when attempting to resolve names.  A
more fully qualified import will help the compiler generate your code a bit
faster, but the resulting class will not be any smaller or faster.

Marshall Dunbar
DPS, Inc.
Co-Author of the Redbook _Accessing the AS/400 System with Java_


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to JAVA400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to JAVA400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to JAVA400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2021 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.